BA Systems BA Systems

Designing for Compliance: How Early-Stage Design Decisions Impact Gateway 2 Submissions

Categories

The Building Safety Act, Gateway 2 is more than just a box to tick — it’s a decisive moment in your project’s lifecycle. For higher-risk buildings, Gateway 2 is the formal green light to start construction. The challenge? By the time you get there, many compliance-critical decisions have already been made.

That’s why the smartest project teams treat compliance as a design driver from day one — not as a late-stage hurdle.


Understanding Gateway 2

Gateway 2 is part of the Building Safety Regulator’s three-stage approval process. For higher-risk buildings, you cannot start construction until you’ve demonstrated to the BSR that your design meets the necessary safety requirements.

At this stage, you’ll need to submit:

  • A full plans application with detailed design information.
  • Evidence that the design complies with building regulations.
  • The fire and emergency file, showing a clear safety strategy.
  • A “design freeze” baseline that will be carried into construction.

If your early-stage design decisions don’t align with compliance requirements, Gateway 2 approval can be delayed — sometimes by months.


How Early Decisions Echo into Gateway 2

The design decisions you make at RIBA Stage 2 (Concept Design) and Stage 3 (Spatial Coordination) have a lasting impact:

  • Layout Choices — Core placement, stair design, and escape routes must work with fire safety strategies from the start.
  • Façade Design — Materials and configurations affect fire spread resistance and insulation performance.
  • Plant Room Location — Influences service routes, compartmentation, and maintenance access.
  • Height & Massing — Triggers additional regulatory thresholds and safety measures.

Each of these can lock in compliance challenges — or, if done right, smooth your path to Gateway 2.


Integrating Compliance at Concept Stage

1️⃣ Bring compliance experts in early — Fire engineers, building control officers, and safety consultants should be part of the design conversation from the first sketches.

2️⃣ Run early compliance simulations — Use BIM modelling for fire strategy, evacuation, and structural performance checks before designs harden.

3️⃣ Hold compliance-led design reviews — Treat them with the same priority as aesthetic reviews to catch non-compliance early.

4️⃣ Document every decision — Keep a clear record of design rationale to include in your Gateway 2 evidence.


Common Pitfalls to Avoid 

  • Deferring compliance checks until Stage 4 — By then, changes are expensive and disruptive.
  • Overlooking small rule breaches — Minor deviations can force major redesigns later.
  • Not aligning disciplines — Structural, services, and architectural teams must coordinate to meet compliance holistically.

Key Takeaways

Gateway 2 success doesn’t start with a form — it starts with the very first design sketch. Treat compliance as a core design principle, and you’ll reduce redesign risks, keep your programme on track, and make your submission smoother.

The Building Safety Regulator’s process is here to raise standards — and early compliance thinking is the most cost-effective way to meet those standards.

How We Can Help 

At BA Systems, we support clients through the entire compliance process:

  • Full technical submittals ready for Gateway 2.
  • Structural engineering sign-off.
  • Product certification and traceability documentation.
  • Installation competence and quality assurance records.

If you have an upcoming Gateway 2 submission or need advice on your balustrading package, get in touch with our team todayWe would be happy to help you!

 

Back to blog